Mining, Logging Contributed to Philippine Disaster

Unchecked illegal gold mining and decades of indiscriminate logging contributed to the high death toll in the Philippines’ worst natural disaster this year, officials and experts say.

Whole towns were washed away or buried by landslides when Typhoon Botha smashed into a mountainous region on the southern island of Mindanao last week, leaving 548 people confirmed dead and 827 missing.

Poverty, greed and the lure of the precious metal have long drawn thousands of prospectors to the region.

"Mining and logging may have had an effect," said civil defence chief Benito Ramos.

"The mountains have been denuded for decades, and filled with holes by our countrymen who are small-time miners. It pains me to say this, but these are the facts," he said.

More >

In Wake of Murders of Labor Leaders, AFL-CIO Asks Obama to Delay Colombia Free Trade Agreement

The murder of four Colombian union leaders in January prompted Richard Trumka, president of the AFL-CIO, to urge President Obama to postpone indefinitely the implementation of the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, approved by the U.S Congress in October.

The letter states that through January, one union member was killed by Colombian troops, a second was shot to death along with his wife, a third worker was “brutally murdered” and a fourth union member employed by the National Industry of Sodas (Coca-Cola) was “murdered by gunfire.”

Over 2,900 union members have been murdered in Colombia over the last 25 years, a number that makes the South American nation the most dangerous in the world for union members.

The letter states that through January, one union member was killed by Colombian troops, a second was shot to death along with his wife, a third worker was “brutally murdered” and a fourth union member employed by the National Industry of Sodas (Coca-Cola) was “murdered by gunfire.”

When the bill passed, it included a Labor Action Plan designed to deal with the violence, but Colombian labor leaders say that has failed:

We applaud the creation of the April 7, 2011, U.S.-Colombia Labor Action Plan that intends to take important steps in addressing endemic labor issues in Colombia. However, the Plan continues to face serious challenges in its implementation. Union leaders and labor activists continue to be assassinated, threatened, and intimidated, and the perpetrators enjoy almost complete impunity.

More >

Lobbying Expenditures Slump in 2011

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Viveca Novak, 202-354-0111
Michael Beckel, 202-354-0108
or press@crp.org

The nation’s economy may be slowly rebounding, but during 2011, the economic engine of K Street sputtered. Overall expenditures on lobbying were down for the first time in more than a decade, according to research by the Center for Responsive Politics.

More than $3.27 billion was spent on lobbying in 2011, according to the Center's preliminary analysis of lobbying reports filed with Congress last week. (An estimated 90 percent of the reports due had been filed by the deadline Friday, so this figure is likely to increase slightly as the remaining fourth-quarter reports are processed.)

Notably, 2011 ranked as the first year since 1999 that lobbying expenditures have dropped, according to the Center's research. During 2010, when health care and stepped-up regulation of the financial sector were the subjects of fierce struggles on Capitol Hill, outlays for lobbying totaled $3.51 billion.

"The political gridlock in the 112th Congress has slowed the flow of money to K Street's hired guns," said Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. "Nevertheless, special interest groups, from the tech industry to public sector unions, continue to hire lobbyists to give them a megaphone in Washington, as well as first-class access and connections."

Still, despite a congressional session marked as much by what didn't get accomplished as what did in the areas of jobs, trade, abortion policy, online piracy, copyright, government spending and the national debt, a handful of interest groups posted banner years.

googlelogo.jpgInternet giant Google more than doubled its spending on lobbying in 2011, posting a record $11.4 million, including $4.2 million during the fourth quarter. The National Association of Realtors, which spent more than $22 million on lobbying, also had a record year -- as did energy behemoth ConocoPhillips, which paid out more than $20.5 million for lobbying services.

Additionally, the TV, music and movie industry stood out among the biggest spenders on lobbying in 2011, posting figures that were up at least 10 percent above spending in 2010 -- and up at least 12 percent from 2009. These groups spent at least $122 million on lobbying in 2011.

Furthermore, commercial banks, telecomm services providers, the mining industry, public sector unions and advocates of reproductive rights were among those increasing their lobbying expenses.

But despite Google’s hefty increase in lobbying, the total for the tech industry was up only slightly in 2011. Last year, these interests spent at least $125.1 million, compared with $122.4 million in 2010.

The top-spending industries in 2011 were the pharmaceutical/health products industry (at least $236 million), the insurance industry ($158 million), the oil and gas industry ($146 million) and electric utilities ($144 million).

Within these four industries, lobbying expenditures were largely comparable to what they were during 2010, although the pharmaceutical industry and oil and gas industry were both down significantly from 2009, when health care and cap-and-trade energy proposals dominated the legislative agenda of the 111th Congress.

Similarly, spending by the high-profile securities and investment industry was nearly on par with such expenditures in 2010.

Last year, the securities and investment industry invested more than $98 million on lobbying as it sought to thwart the new regulations called for by the Wall Street overhaul championed by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.). That was a shade less than the year before, when the industry spent about $101.4 million.

Investment firm Goldman Sachs alone spent $4.35 million on lobbying in 2011 (down from $4.61 million in 2010), while Morgan Stanley spent $2.37 million (down from $2.75 million in 2010).

uschamber.jpg The U.S. Chamber of Commerce once again ranked as the biggest spender on lobbying in 2011.

Last year, the Chamber and its subsidiaries spent $66.37 million, although, like ConocoPhillips, the National Association of Realtors and some other organizations, the Chamber's numbers include federal, state and grassroots lobbying expenses. (Most organizations include only federal-level lobbying expenses in their reports to Congress.)

Notably, the number of active, federally registered lobbyists continued to decline, with 2011 seeing only about 12,600 lobbyists' names appear in federal filings, according to the Center's research.

That's down from a high of nearly 14,900 in 2007, the year before new regulations and restrictions on lobbyists were implemented in the wake of the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal. Those policies, as well as new rules pushed by President Barack Obama, have increased the potential drawbacks of being a registered lobbyist.

OpenSecrets.org's searchable lobbying database is accessible here.

###

ABOUT THE CENTER FOR RESPONSIVE POLITICS

The Center for Responsive Politics is the nation's premier research group tracking and reporting on money in federal politics and its effect on elections and public policy. The nonpartisan, nonprofit Center aims to create a more educated voter, an involved citizenry and a more responsive government. The Center's award-winning website, OpenSecrets.org, is the most comprehensive resource for campaign contributions, lobbying data and analysis available anywhere. The Center relies on support from a combination of foundation grants, individual contributions and custom data work, and it accepts no contributions from businesses, labor unions or trade associations.

Don Blankenship Has Filed Papers to Open New Coal Mines

Don Blankenship, the former CEO of Massey Energy, who was cited as having the worst fatality rate in the mining industry prior to the 29 deaths at the Upper Big Branch explosion in April 2010, has filed paperwork to open new mines. Blankenship lost his job as CEO but faced no other penalties and paid no real price for the lives that were lost under his watch. He filed the paperwork on behalf of McCoy Coal Group Inc. of Belfry, Ky., in January, although the company has not sought a new mining permit.

Massey under Blankenship had a legacy that should prohibit him from ever working in the field of mining again:

Following the April 2010 the explosian at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch (W.Va.) mine, a Mine Workers (UMWA) report on the disaster summed up the tragedy in its title: Industrial Homicide. An independent report on the disaster commissioned by former Gov. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) concluded the responsibility for the explosion “lies with the management of Massey Energy…[B]y frequently and knowingly violating the law and blatantly disregarding known safety practices….Massey exhibited a corporate mentality that placed the drive to produce coal above worker safety.” And an investigation by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) found the company kept two sets of books to hide safety problems.

Prior to the disaster, MSHA had filed more than 450 safety citations at Upper Big Branch, which wasn’t the only Massey mine with safety problems. MSHA records show that in at least six of the 10 years prior to the explosion, Massey mine’s injury rate has been worse than the national average for similar operations. In 2009, Massey and subsidiary Aracoma Coal Co. agreed to pay $4.2 million in criminal fines and civil penalties related to a January 2006 fire that killed two miners at the Alma No. 1 mine.

But far from taking responsibility, Blankenship has implied the deadly blast was God’s fault and told the government to keep its hands off patriotic business like Massey. A business so patriotic that the Mine Workers’ report described it as:

"A rogue corporation, acting without real regard for mine safety and health law and regulations, that established a physical working environment that can only be described as a bomb waiting to go off."

Blankenship has made a career of busting unions, violating mine safety laws, attacking environmentalists and shilling for the far right and corporate America. The workers at Upper Big Branch were not in a union. A report following the tragedy found that unionized coal mines are far safer.

Alpha Natural Resources, the company that recently purchased Massey reached an agreement with the federal government to pay $210 million for the disaster.

For 29 Dead Miners, No Justice

Early on April 5, 2010, in the heart of West Virginia coal country, a huge explosion killed 29 workers at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine. Later that day, President Obama directed Labor Secretary Hilda L. Solis to conduct “the most thorough and comprehensive investigation possible” and to work with the Justice Department to investigate any criminal violations.

On Tuesday, the Labor Department issued a 972-page report on the calamity — the nation’s worst mining disaster in 40 years. It concluded that Massey’s “unlawful policies and practices” were the “root cause of this tragedy.” It identified over 300 violations of the Mine Safety and Health Act, including nine flagrant violations that contributed to the explosion.

Read the rest of the commentary here.

Energy Giant Alpha Natural Resources Agrees to Mine Disaster Settlement

Alpha_Massey_logos.png

The parent company of Massey Energy has agreed to pay a $209 million settlement for its subsidiary’s role in the Upper Big Branch explosion that killed 29 miners in a West Virginia coal mine last year. That is the largest ever settlement in a government mine disaster, the New York Times reports.

The settlement will allow Alpha Natural Resources to avoid prosecution, but will not protect the Massey executives more directly involved in the accident. 

Alpha, which became the second-largest U.S. coal company when it purchased Massey in January, has greatly increased its spending on lobbying and contributions to politicians in recent years, according to research by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Indeed, the company seems on track to set a new spending record this year for its annual federal lobbying budget. Through September, the energy company has spent $530,600 on federal lobbying, bringing it within striking distance of its previous all-time annual high of $608,000, reached in 2010.

The company has largely targeted environmental regulation and climate change mitigation this year with its lobbying dollars, according to its federal lobbying reports. It has also lobbied on mine safety regulations and on energy policy, advocating for increased clean coal investment. 

Alpha has also spent big through its political action committee recently, favoring Republicans. 

During the 2010 election cycle, the company's PAC donated $211,500 to political candidates at the federal level. Through September this year, the company has donated about $150,400. Most of the campaign cash spent this year has gone to congressmen in big coal-producing states such as West Virginia, Kentucky, Virginia and Pennsylvania. 

The biggest recipient has been Rep. David McKinley (R-W.V.), a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee (which regulates the coal industry). McKinley has received $10,000 from the company's PAC so far this year (the legal maximum a PAC can contribute between a candidate's general and primary elections). He's also received an additional $11,500 from company employees.

As OpenSecrets Blog has previously reported, Massey Energy was no stranger to Washington spending in its heyday. Massey's PAC spent no less than $20,000 during each election cycle between 1998 and 2004, according to the Center's research. Typically, a few thousand dollars of that spending were direct contributions to candidates. After 2000, its spending fell as donations turned exclusively to Republicans. In 2010, the year of the accident, its total spending spiked again to $14,000, and it donated $2,000 a piece to three West Virginia Republicans.

Mining Firm to Pay Record $209 Million in Deadly West Virginia Blast

The current owner of the West Virginia mine where an explosion last year killed 29 workers has agreed to pay a record $209 million in penalties and restitution to settle an array of civil and criminal charges.

U.S. Department of Justice officials today announced the settlement, which stems from the nation’s worst mine disaster in four decades. In a news release, Attorney General Eric Holder said it “represents the largest-ever resolution in a criminal investigation of a mine disaster and will ensure appropriate steps are taken to improve mine safety now and will fund research to enhance mine safety in the future.”

First reported by The Charleston Gazette, the settlement will cover civil penalties and the potential criminal liability of Alpha Natural Resources Inc., which bought mine owner Massey Energy in June. However, the settlement does not resolve any potential criminal violations by Massey personnel, and The Wall Street Journal reports that prosecutors say their criminal investigation is continuing.

The only Massey official prosecuted so far in connection with the disaster was the former security chief at the mine, who has been convicted in federal court of obstructing a criminal investigation and lying to investigators.

The settlement was disclosed hours before the Mine Safety and Health Administration announced that it imposed a fine of $10.8 million, the biggest fine in the agency’s history, in connection with the disaster. The fine was included in the $209 million settlement.

The mine safety agency also released a report blaming Massey’s hazardous practices and corporate culture as “the root cause” of the tragedy. The regulators found that Massey allowed coal dust to build up, fueling the explosion. They brushed aside a Massey investigation that contended that the blast was caused by a surge of natural gas that couldn’t have been prevented.

In all, the safety agency issued 369 citations, including 12 that it said directly contributed to the accident. Nine of those were labeled “flagrant,” the most serious issued by the agency, including failing to properly test for methane and to clean up combustible coal dust.

The Journal added that the agreement does not address the 18 pending wrongful death lawsuits filed by some of the families of miners who were killed. Under the settlement, however, Alpha Resources will pay $1.5 million to each of the families of the 29 miners killed and to two survivors, an overall sum of $46.5 million.

Stuart Silverstein

Related Posts:
Lying to Mine Disaster Investigators Leads to Conviction of Ex-Security Chief
Investigators Say West Virginia Mine Owner Falsified Safety Records
Report on West Virginia Mine Disaster Faults ‘Reckless’ Management

Arizona Uranium MIning

Denison Mines recommenced development work on the Arizona 1 mine in April 2007 and restarted Uranium mining operations in November 2009. The mine is an underground operation employing a combination of long hole and shrinkage stopping methods at a mining rate of 335 tons per day, four days per week. Ore from the Arizona 1 mine is hauled by truck approximately 325 miles to the White Mesa mill. The mine employs a total of 32 people. Conservation groups and American Indian tribes today filed an appeal in the 9th Circuit Court challenging a lower court ruling that allowed the uranium mine near Grand Canyon National Park to re-open without updating decades-old environmental reviews. The Arizona 1 uranium mine is located near Kanab Creek immediately north of Grand Canyon National Park. In 2010, conservation groups and tribes sued the Bureau of Land Management for failing to modernize 23-year-old mining plans and environmental reviews prior to allowing Denison Mines to resume uranium mining after the mine was shuttered in 1992. A federal judge in Phoenix this fall sided with the Bureau and the uranium industry saying no new plans or reviews were needed, prompting the current appeal.

More >